The comparative report launched among EC officers
The project partners: Migration Policy Group (MPG, Belgium), leading organization of the project research along with the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA, Poland) and France Terre d’Asile (FTDA, France), presented comparative results from the newest project baseline comparative study “The European benchmark for refugee integration: A comparative analysis of the National Integration Evaluation Mechanism in 14 EU countries” .
Moreover, the panellists discussed the impact of advocacy work based on the project research with officers from DG for Migration and Home Affairs of the European Commission. The meeting took place in the EC premises 2nd of July and gathered c. 25 participants. In the first part a representative of IPA presented the project design, what was followed by research-oriented MPG presentation. Alexander Wolffhardt and Carmine Conte from MPG discussed research objectives, methodology, indicators and key comparative results from the report. Case of France presented by Alexia Duvernoy from FTDA, was used as an example of advocacy work within the project. Participants were interested in the methodology of comparative research, interpretation of different indicators, approach to mainstreaming and targeted integration policies for beneficiaries of international protection among other issues. Similar meeting is planned after next evaluation round and publication of the new report.
Read publication: The European benchmark for refugee integration: A comparative analysis of the National Integration Evaluation Mechanism in 14 EU countries
Join the webinar: ‘The European benchmark for refugee integration’ (5 July 2019 at 11h00 Brussels time)
Moreover, the panellists discussed the impact of advocacy work based on the project research with officers from DG for Migration and Home Affairs of the European Commission. The meeting took place in the EC premises 2nd of July and gathered c. 25 participants. In the first part a representative of IPA presented the project design, what was followed by research-oriented MPG presentation. Alexander Wolffhardt and Carmine Conte from MPG discussed research objectives, methodology, indicators and key comparative results from the report. Case of France presented by Alexia Duvernoy from FTDA, was used as an example of advocacy work within the project. Participants were interested in the methodology of comparative research, interpretation of different indicators, approach to mainstreaming and targeted integration policies for beneficiaries of international protection among other issues. Similar meeting is planned after next evaluation round and publication of the new report. Read publication: The European benchmark for refugee integration: A comparative analysis of the National Integration Evaluation Mechanism in 14 EU countries
Join the webinar: ‘The European benchmark for refugee integration’ (5 July 2019 at 11h00 Brussels time)
